This entry was posted
on Sunday, July 18th, 2010 at 1:00 and is filed under QOTD.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
I’d be interested in hearing the counter argument. Personally I think the quote inarguably true. If an institution is non-secular then it is beholden to some religious view. Since all religions are, by definition, mutually exclusive, there’s really no way for a non-secular institution to represent any interest besides the narrow ones of the particular sect embodied by that institution.
July 18th, 2010 at 18:41
I’d be interested in hearing the counter argument. Personally I think the quote inarguably true. If an institution is non-secular then it is beholden to some religious view. Since all religions are, by definition, mutually exclusive, there’s really no way for a non-secular institution to represent any interest besides the narrow ones of the particular sect embodied by that institution.