<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 18th July 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheistweb.org/qotd/1092/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/1092</link>
	<description>Daily quotations to interest, inspire or amuse atheists and agnostics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptainZero1969</title>
		<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/1092/comment-page-1#comment-17486</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptainZero1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistweb.org/qotd/1092#comment-17486</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested in hearing the counter argument. Personally I think the quote inarguably true. If an institution is non-secular then it is beholden to some religious view. Since all religions are, by definition, mutually exclusive, there&#039;s really no way for a non-secular institution to represent any interest besides the narrow ones of the particular sect embodied by that institution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested in hearing the counter argument. Personally I think the quote inarguably true. If an institution is non-secular then it is beholden to some religious view. Since all religions are, by definition, mutually exclusive, there&#8217;s really no way for a non-secular institution to represent any interest besides the narrow ones of the particular sect embodied by that institution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

