31st December 2010
“The refusal to teach sex education unless it is within a religious context is just another ploy to deny women emancipation.”
Samantha Lyster
“The refusal to teach sex education unless it is within a religious context is just another ploy to deny women emancipation.”
Samantha Lyster
December 31st, 2010 at 1:03
Conflating sex and religion can’t be a good thing. Ask the catholic church.
December 31st, 2010 at 2:02
If someone was running around, constantly screaming that CARS are evil! Cars are of the devil and should be resisted! Keep cars out of your mind and out of your life! Then these would NOT be the people you would go to for engine repair.
I see no reason to trust clergy about matters of the flesh. Their lack of expertise is too blatant.
December 31st, 2010 at 4:50
“The refusal to teach sex education especially within a religious context is just another ploy to deny women emancipation.”
There; fixed that for you, Samantha.
December 31st, 2010 at 4:51
Ah, and I’m stupid. I get it now. And I agree. That was weirded oddly, though.
December 31st, 2010 at 4:52
Worded, rather. And no more commenting after wine here. X-D
December 31st, 2010 at 13:33
This illustrates the point nicely.
December 31st, 2010 at 14:10
Tech shakes his head and toots to himself.WOW do you guys ever need to get a life and get a handel on things.
December 31st, 2010 at 16:29
Learn something new every day. I’ll have to remember that taking four minutes out of a single day to read a quote and react to it negates an entire life, and also that listening to Handel somehow will rectify that problem. Damn it, and I so very much prefer Schoenberg.