1st July 2011

“Basing one's decisions on a dubious interpretation of a rather unpleasant and badly compiled book of Bronze Age myths is simply not a good idea.”

Anon.

33 Responses to “1st July 2011”

  1. solomon Says:

    Anon is a one naive, skeptic, arrogant, ignorant, stupid atheists fools. Simply blurting out words.

  2. archaeopteryx Says:

    Anon is spot on – the evidence is all around us.

  3. Dan Says:

    Solomon,
    First off, you can’t be naive and skeptical at the same time.

    Second, how is it naive, ignorant and stupid to say that Bronze Age myths are, well, not a good idea?

  4. Axel Says:

    Too true, and this, of course, applies to quite a number of such books!

  5. R J Says:

    you know, i’d really like to give Sol’s first response today to a 5th
    grade english class ……….and let them analyse it grammer- wise………….. sort of like ” what’s wrong with this picture .”
    i bet they’d love it !!!

    AND….. Arch and DAN…….

    a word to the wise, boys……..

    you’d better watch your step when you start sparring with SOL……..

    REMEMBER ( ! ) he speaks from the vantage point of
    CLUELESSNESS……………….
    AND….
    he swings the mighty pocket knife of RIGHTEOUSNESS !!!!!!!

    THIS GUY IS NO PALOOKA !!!!! you have BEEN WARNED !!!!!!

    have a nice weekend, all !!

  6. Dan Says:

    RJ,
    Yeah, but I kinda like seeing SOL’s clueless righteousness crash into a wall of basic knowledge. The result is often eventually Sol’s lashing out with some real gems! 🙂

  7. Jeff Says:

    It’s too bad that the religionists find it so much easier to live life according to such dubious interpretations than to go to the trouble of thinking for themselves. After all, why bother using up brain connections in thought, when some wild eyed preacher with a ninth grade education, hair in his ears and nothing more than a talent for praying up a storm and quoting ancient texts can then tell you what he thinks they mean and how such texts are relevant to things of which their authors had neither concept nor understanding. Of course, at the same time he’ll tell you exactly how much money you must give HIM in order to get in good grace with the imagined author of such texts.

    If anyone finds that offensive to the “men of the cloth”, welcome to the TFL.

  8. nancy Says:

    i agree with aron and dan.

  9. solomon Says:

    nancy,

    You simply agree with fools. You are sacrificing your neck to the gallows…l

  10. solomon Says:

    Axel ,

    Which ‘book’ are you referring to? I dare you challenge me on any part of its context.
    The ‘book’ may not refer to any book.

  11. Jeff Says:

    2 Kings, 23:25

    Just exactly what kind of a loving God uses 2 female bears to tear up 42 young men just because they had the gall to mock an old, bald headed man by calling him “you baldhead”. Am I to be given that this is a lesson in not mocking people? Or is there some other lesson to be gotten from this act? Oh, right, you’re not supposed to denigrate in any way “His” prophets. BUT JUST EXACTLY HOW ARE WE TO KNOW HIS PROPHETS FROM THE RUN OF THE MILL CRAZY OLD COOT? Frankly, they all look the same to me!

  12. solomon Says:

    Sorry Jeff….
    I can’t comment coz’ that story came from none of the books I’am referring to.
    Whaa….ka…ka…ka…
    See. how damn easy the atheists are fooled..
    Whaa…ka..ka…ka…
    Do you think its about time you all reconsider your beliefs.

  13. solomon Says:

    Intelligent beings can figure out tricks.
    Can nature figure them out?

  14. solomon Says:

    R J,

    Now can you figure out what kind of a 5th grader I’am categorized?

  15. Edmond Says:

    Yeah, Sol, instead, your book has talking ants and birds, winged horses, and the tearing of the moon in half. MUCH more realistic and relevant to modern life.

  16. Jeff Says:

    Sol,

    Yep it can – it figured out the trick of evolving which resulted in the intelligent beings which figured out the trick you pulled. How ’bout this, you name the particular bronze age book with which you’re familiar, I’ll rip it to shreds?

    As to reconsidering, I’m willing to put my 40 plus years of consideration up against however much you’ve spent examining yours any time. Can you even conceive of a 14.3 billion light year information bubble as a limitation on the perspective of cosmology? I not only can, I came up with the concept independently, and am currently working on the gravitational interactions of matter outside that bubble as an explanation for the measured acceleration of the universal red-shift. Any of that ring a bell?

  17. archaeopteryx Says:

    The above lively exchange confirms my view that solomon performs a useful function in stimulating discussion. He* may believe what he writes, or may just be mischievous – it doesn’t matter.

    * or she

  18. reetBob Says:

    This person is immature. Arguing with these non-arguments is futile. Assuming he represents Christianity is lazy.

  19. Dan Says:

    Sol,

    You simply agree with fools. You are sacrificing your neck to the gallows…

    Just like I said: clueless righteousness crashing into a wall of basic knowledge.

    Intelligent beings can figure out tricks.
    Can nature figure them out?

    Actually yes. Antibiotic resistance is an excellent example, unless of course you consider bacteria as being intelligent beings.

  20. solomon Says:

    Dan,

    If you’re not a 5th grader in English, I’am comparing a ‘being’ with the so called nature remember.
    Nature….a word they themselves does’nt really know what it represents.

  21. Dan Says:

    Sol,
    Please learn to write/type in readable English.

  22. solomon Says:

    Atheists are actually allies of SATAN.
    Allies of SATAN won’t ever bow to true humans.
    In other words they won’t admit if they are wrong or defeated.

  23. Dan Says:

    AAANNNNNDDDDD he lashes out with still more clueless righteousness! Hilarious.

  24. R J Says:

    another fumble sol………………….

    heck, those dopey atheists are’nt allies of SATAN……..

    you got the letters mixed up !!

    we’re allies of SANTA !!!!!

    gee whiz , sol , we get enough bad press !!!

    HO-HO-HO

  25. solomon Says:

    Edmond,

    “Yeah, Sol, instead, your book has talking ants and birds, winged horses, and the tearing of the moon in half. MUCH more realistic and relevant to modern life.”

    Then whats so strange or irrelevant about that. Birds chirp don’t they. That would be their language Only most human can’t understand. Have you ever tried to fix a tiny wireless microphone near an ants mouth to hear them talk?
    Birds , insects or even some beings like ants happens to have and did’nt have wings. While for horses if God wanted them to have one, he can just fix them with a pair each, case closed.

  26. solomon Says:

    Jeff,

    “As to reconsidering, I’m willing to put my 40 plus years of consideration up against however much you’ve spent examining yours any time. Can you even conceive of a 14.3 billion light year information bubble as a limitation on the perspective of cosmology? I not only can, I came up with the concept independently, and am currently working on the gravitational interactions of matter outside that bubble as an explanation for the measured acceleration of the universal red-shift. Any of that ring a bell?”

    Just blurt out what is it you want to debate on your so called study.
    Or just forget about it before you are humiliated.

  27. Dan Says:

    Clueless. Self-righteousness.

  28. solomon Says:

    Dan,

    No substance to debate…
    Like a dog…hanging out its tongue.

  29. Dan Says:

    I know Sol. That’s my point. We can’t debate cluelessness nor self-righteousness. It’s nonsense much like a dog with its tongue hanging out.

    I’ve been criticizing you in this way in the hope you’d stop being like that.

  30. solomon Says:

    It’s just because you have no substance to refute truth. That’s it.

  31. Dan Says:

    So that’s a “No” to giving the clueless self-righteousness a rest?

  32. solomon Says:

    Chicken..
    Reluctant to debate…
    Puk…Puk…Puk….

  33. Dan Says:

    Sillyman,
    When in this conversation have you attempted to debate anything? You’re evangelizing, so don’t lie that you’ve been trying to debate.