2nd October 2011

“If we know the Bible has content that is false, how can we believe any of it?”


8 Responses to “2nd October 2011”

  1. John Says:

    Never let the truth get in the way of a good story.

  2. Dan Says:

    Unfortunately this one appropriately describes some people I know very well. Their responses have never been comprehensible to me. :-/

  3. archaeopteryx Says:

    The answer’s easy! We pick and choose the bits that suit us!

  4. Jeff Says:

    Re: Response at 2:03

    John, Thanks for the Mark Twain-ism. I wonder if Mathew, Mark and Luke would agree? OH, right, they told pretty much the same story, didn’t they.

  5. The Heretic Says:

    Yeah, they all manufactured similar rumors 50 – 200 years after the incident.

  6. Sinjin Smythe Says:

    I never understand the religi-Os and biblical credibility problem. Otherwise reasonable people will accept this improbability even if it is showing the warts of impossibility instead of the simple and obvious reality that it is just a narrative among others written by frightened tribal primitives.

    False content puts it mildly. the bible contains absurd content. If it weren’t so darn sad the bible might be the friggen best comedy ever put to pen. Only an idiot could be a christian after reading the bible. I mean WOW! Who in their right mind could think the bible was anything other than fantasy?

    I remember reading somewhere that if you say something totally insane with complete confidence some people will believe what you are talking about. I don’t want to believe anyone would be so dumb to actually take the bible seriously at all. It is nothing but a poorly put together, rambling rehash of ghost stories, told by nervous ancients. Just pure drivel!

  7. Sinjin Smythe Says:

    Great list of biblical nonsense

  8. electrabotanical Says:

    There’s a local radio contest for your favorite fairy tale. Guess which one I’ll name?

    the baby in the manger!!!!