This entry was posted
on Monday, September 9th, 2013 at 2:00 and is filed under QOTD.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Absolutely perfect reflection of why a logical proof of can not be proved in an a priori manner. Just ask Immanuel Kant! But a belief in a justification outside of the rational could be hypothesized. This might be a so called “leap of faith”. These are not good enough for me. Alas.
September 9th, 2013 at 5:26
Absolutely perfect reflection of why a logical proof of can not be proved in an a priori manner. Just ask Immanuel Kant! But a belief in a justification outside of the rational could be hypothesized. This might be a so called “leap of faith”. These are not good enough for me. Alas.