<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3rd July 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305</link>
	<description>Daily quotations to interest, inspire or amuse atheists and agnostics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hypatia</title>
		<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>Hypatia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>Rest in peace Douglas. The words live on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rest in peace Douglas. The words live on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>Thanks Critic - yeah, that's me. Duuuuude.... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Critic - yeah, that&#8217;s me. Duuuuude&#8230;. <img src='http://atheistweb.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critic</title>
		<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>Critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>Chris: I just skimmed a few of the comments on the Newsweak[sic] article - absolutely appalling. Your comments (ChrisRosendin?) are concise and right to the point but I believe you were arguing to the extremely closed minded. Your calm and logical arguments are to be commended - I would have unleashed a vitriolic fury of &lt;i&gt;ad hominem&lt;/i&gt; arguments - because if they were ever warranted, it would be against the complete stupidity shown in those comments. A "bible-thumping freak fest" indeed (that's a good collective &lt;i&gt;ad hominem&lt;/i&gt; argument).

After reading those comments I feel so dirty - I think I'll need to reboot my computer.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: I just skimmed a few of the comments on the Newsweak[sic] article - absolutely appalling. Your comments (ChrisRosendin?) are concise and right to the point but I believe you were arguing to the extremely closed minded. Your calm and logical arguments are to be commended - I would have unleashed a vitriolic fury of <i>ad hominem</i> arguments - because if they were ever warranted, it would be against the complete stupidity shown in those comments. A &#8220;bible-thumping freak fest&#8221; indeed (that&#8217;s a good collective <i>ad hominem</i> argument).</p>
<p>After reading those comments I feel so dirty - I think I&#8217;ll need to reboot my computer&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critic</title>
		<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>Critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When you look at it rationally.....&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Always a though thing for godbots to do since there reason for existence is based on &lt;i&gt;ir&lt;/i&gt;-rationality.

Douglas Adams was truly insightful. I think I like his writing so much because reminds me of my favorite American author: Mark Twain. They both wrote in the context of their time but a majority of Twain's work still remains pertinent 100+ years later. I hope that Adam's work will still be read and enjoyed 100 years from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When you look at it rationally&#8230;..</p></blockquote>
<p>Always a though thing for godbots to do since there reason for existence is based on <i>ir</i>-rationality.</p>
<p>Douglas Adams was truly insightful. I think I like his writing so much because reminds me of my favorite American author: Mark Twain. They both wrote in the context of their time but a majority of Twain&#8217;s work still remains pertinent 100+ years later. I hope that Adam&#8217;s work will still be read and enjoyed 100 years from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewG</title>
		<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1754</guid>
		<description>... that was 'imagine' obviously :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; that was &#8216;imagine&#8217; obviously <img src='http://atheistweb.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewG</title>
		<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1753</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1753</guid>
		<description>Can't you imaging where our species would be technologically if 1000 years of our progress hadn't been crushed under the boot of organised religion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t you imaging where our species would be technologically if 1000 years of our progress hadn&#8217;t been crushed under the boot of organised religion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sutton</title>
		<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>And don't the theologians and bishops howl when we do discuss religion. We are called "militant atheists" or "fundamentalist atheists" and are misrepresented and vilified from all religious quarters. 

Still, sometimes any publicity is good publicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And don&#8217;t the theologians and bishops howl when we do discuss religion. We are called &#8220;militant atheists&#8221; or &#8220;fundamentalist atheists&#8221; and are misrepresented and vilified from all religious quarters. </p>
<p>Still, sometimes any publicity is good publicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence Meaden</title>
		<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>Terence Meaden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>“When you look at it rationally there is no reason why [religious] ideas shouldn't be as open to debate as any other, except that we have agreed somehow between us that they shouldn't be.”  Douglas Adams 1952 - 2001

There have been few periods of time, anywhere in the world, when it was possible to critique, safely, the prevailing religious ethos. This is one of the few periods---at least for us in the West---when it is possible to attack the nonsense of the biblical fables and argue with the indoctrinated simpletons who uphold them.
It is woeful that, because of the huge negative effects of religion, much of human history has been a massive error; and it is ongoing. 
Atheists have rationality and open-minded intelligence on their side. They must make their philosophically-flawless case better known in the face of the continuing crazy belief in supernatural and superstitious stupidities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“When you look at it rationally there is no reason why [religious] ideas shouldn&#8217;t be as open to debate as any other, except that we have agreed somehow between us that they shouldn&#8217;t be.”  Douglas Adams 1952 - 2001</p>
<p>There have been few periods of time, anywhere in the world, when it was possible to critique, safely, the prevailing religious ethos. This is one of the few periods&#8212;at least for us in the West&#8212;when it is possible to attack the nonsense of the biblical fables and argue with the indoctrinated simpletons who uphold them.<br />
It is woeful that, because of the huge negative effects of religion, much of human history has been a massive error; and it is ongoing.<br />
Atheists have rationality and open-minded intelligence on their side. They must make their philosophically-flawless case better known in the face of the continuing crazy belief in supernatural and superstitious stupidities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 05:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistweb.org/qotd/305#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>If you want to see where the action is, check out the comments section relating the Newsweak(sic) article on who is better - Lincoln or Darwin. No frickin kidding. Because they happen to have been born on the same day. You will see some beauts posted there. So far, I've seen:

Pasqual's wager
MACRO evolution
Genes never change
God of the Gaps
Jeremiah bible quotes (spoiler alert: God is a prick)
Darwin was a racist
Evolution caused Hitler
Stalin!
Evolution isn't FACT, it's a THEORY!
Micheal Behe
Flagellum Motor
The human eye (pinnacle of design perfection)

I promise you you've never seen such hysterical unreason in one place. It's a bible thumping freak fest!

If you've ever seen the movie Armageddon (Bruce Willis) there's a line "Scariest environment imaginable...that all you need to say."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to see where the action is, check out the comments section relating the Newsweak(sic) article on who is better - Lincoln or Darwin. No frickin kidding. Because they happen to have been born on the same day. You will see some beauts posted there. So far, I&#8217;ve seen:</p>
<p>Pasqual&#8217;s wager<br />
MACRO evolution<br />
Genes never change<br />
God of the Gaps<br />
Jeremiah bible quotes (spoiler alert: God is a prick)<br />
Darwin was a racist<br />
Evolution caused Hitler<br />
Stalin!<br />
Evolution isn&#8217;t FACT, it&#8217;s a THEORY!<br />
Micheal Behe<br />
Flagellum Motor<br />
The human eye (pinnacle of design perfection)</p>
<p>I promise you you&#8217;ve never seen such hysterical unreason in one place. It&#8217;s a bible thumping freak fest!</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve ever seen the movie Armageddon (Bruce Willis) there&#8217;s a line &#8220;Scariest environment imaginable&#8230;that all you need to say.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
