Comments on: 30th January 2010

By: solomon

solomon — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:54:01 +0000

You all are twisting my reasoning regarding the table creation as if I said the table undergoes biological life. My example of citing the table creation is to reason out any existing thing except God must have a creator.

By: solomon

solomon — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:17:30 +0000

Another evolving “chicken”. puk……..puk.. puk..puk..

By: Greg

Greg — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:07:23 +0000

Hi CapZ,

From an evolutionary point of view, unicorns are infinitely more probable than God.

Greg

By: solomon

solomon — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:26:34 +0000

Another comment coming out from a “chicken” as expected. No need to bother.

By: CaptainZero1969

CaptainZero1969 — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:06:54 +0000

Hey! Unicorns and God have a lot in common! Well spotted, Sol!

By: solomon

solomon — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:20:55 +0000

Somebody mentions unicorn.
To me unicorn is just like a cartoon character as bedtime stories to little children.

By: solomon

solomon — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:07:33 +0000

Dear tech,

I don’t know at which part you agree with Noreflection, but a quick glance to his comments I sense that the comments should be directed to Christians not me a Muslim. I did mention the word babbling. It was not directed to his comments but to himself rather.

By: John

John — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:29:20 +0000

BAT
I just sat through the full 2 hour video and it is an eye opener. Part one is why I am and will always be an Atheist. Part 2, Ii sort of always figured from the BS of da’bush and da’dick last 8 years of doom. Part 3 I heard about years ago in college and I think at that time they where called the Tri-lateralist’s or something like that.

Praise be to the US DOLLAR!!

This is where I found the video you spoke of.
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-594683847743189197

By: Bornagain A. Theist

Bornagain A. Theist — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:49:42 +0000

Don’t you worry about your English and spelling. You are trying and you are participating – that’s what counts.

BAT

By: Bornagain A. Theist

Bornagain A. Theist — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:48:10 +0000

Twasn’t Captain, man; twas me, BAT. And while I realize your question was addressed to CapZ, I feel just as welcome to jump in on a subject as I want you or anyone else to feel jumping in on my subjects.

Here is how the seemingly odd chain of events occurred. I googled “paradigm shift” (because, though I have heard the term, I was ignorant of its meaning(s).

It seems that its meaning(s) have vastly expanded since its origin in 1962 when Thomas Kuhn invented the term.

One of many comments in Wikipedia is: “Since the 1960s, the term has been found useful to thinkers in numerous non-scientific contexts. Compare as a structured form of Zeitgeist.” That term rang a bell. I had seen an “issue” if you please, of Zeitgeist on YouTube, and I recall that it dealt with religion. Given that we are discussing religion, or the lack of it on this board, I felt that the link I sent was as appropriate as could be.

Dare I ask if you watched the contents of the link?

If not, why not?

If so, do you have any relevant, logical comments?

If you refuse to do so, for any reason other than having already watched it and given it thought, would you be surprised if we were disappointed in your choice?

BAT