For John,
Have you lost the argument?

Now you have admit that science could not provide the ultimate unser to anything.Thats why we have to turn to god or the Qoran which is the source of ultimate truth.I appreciate what science have discovered but human could not grasp the ultimate truth of things even they are given billions of years researching them.All the while that is said in the Qoran, the past the future, science,biology or whatever have been proven true.So one should start from the Qoran and fid the proof what is stored in it.

I will give you a day or two to look into transitional fossils

Missed a trick there ‘smokes. Should have given him a month, Oh the peace…

Oh and one more thing. the ONLY thing science is looking for is the truth. Not what you, I or anyone else wants it to be. No wishful thinking, nor does science have any vested interest in trying to eliminate your god. If that happens as a result of the data, then so be it. Truth and only the truth. Keep that in mind when you make your replies.

As I have pointed out multiple times before. Science never PROVES anything. Science looks at the available evidence, formulates ideas, hypothesis and then theories via experiments and observations. Theories are the accumulation of large amounts of evidence all of which have been successfully falsified, or tested by other valid experiments. The idea/hypothesis/theory must also be repeatable by others. Even GRAVITY has never been PROVEN. It has simply never been observed not to occur when the law says it should. Only when considering the massive preponderance of evidence, did it become a law of nature. Should a valid exception to gravity ever become known, it would destroy that law. The same exact thing can be said for every theory, including evolution.

Instead of blowing off what I said, how about taking some time to look up just what science is all about and understanding its attributes and limitations? You might learn something. Your constant and immediate reaction to dismiss a comment every time someone attempts to explain something to you is the primary reason you are not taken seriously. Stop acting like an immature kid and try to learn something. You can start by removing the word PROVE and all it’s variations from any discussion in this forum. Science isn’t in the business of proving anything.

Now regarding your transitional fossils. I am surprised that you haven’t bothered to check into this yourself, especially considering the mass of information on the internet. Incidentally, the comment I made about ALL fossils being transitional is valid. All creatures are in a constant state of change, including today. This is a fact as shown by thousands of peer reviewed scientific papers. If you want to start looking into them, begin here. http://www.genetics.org/ You will find countless peer-reviewed research papers on all sorts of biological topics.

I will give you a day or two to look into transitional fossils ON YOUR OWN via the internet. If you cannot locate any valid data, let me know.

Sol, I give you ancestral candidate: Nakalipithicus.

It’s very hard or possibly impossible to nail it down to a single point. The species keep changing, you see. But this creature was very close to the split if not the split itself.

I’m curious. How do the religious account for the fact that Earth has a fossil record millions of years long but Homo Sapiens Sapiens only has a fossil record of .2 million years?