16th August 2011

“If only atheists had influence commensurate with our numbers.”


24 Responses to “16th August 2011”

  1. solomon Says:

    There won’t be any, even given all of the time needed. Coz’ atheists are the condemn fools. Arrogant stone hearted lots that not even for once be thankful or appreciate what God have granted them.

  2. R J Says:

    oh, i’d say our influence is pretty potent.

  3. solomon Says:

    You keep dreaming.

  4. JoeCascio Says:

    The word is commensurate. You’re welcome.

  5. solomon Says:

    All the atheists are bluffing.
    Answer this.
    Could nature determine such a voice like Julio Iglesias is produced?

  6. R J Says:

    looks like more gibberish posts are

    on the way……..

    that first one today, is REALLY out of it .

  7. Atheist MC Says:


    Could nature determine such a voice like Julio Iglesias is produced?

    O.K Solly you win, there is definitely a Satan.

  8. Atheist MC Says:

    Atheist influence is on the rise

  9. solomon Says:

    Yes I win. Coz you all can’t answer truth.

  10. solomon Says:

    Dan……wheres Dan……?
    Why are you so quiet?
    Maybe you want to have a try.
    But don’t bluff again.

  11. Admin Says:

    “The word is commensurate.”

    Ooops! Thanks Joe.

  12. solomon Says:

    Could nature determine the deliciousness of countless delicacies?
    Sure atheism are outdated bluffing stuffs.

  13. archaeopteryx Says:

    Could our tastes have evolved to like foods that give us energy and other nutrients we need? (A rhetorical question for all save one of contributors!)

  14. solomon Says:


    If time is needed for taste buds to evolve then the early man could have munch charcoal and dare to say….
    Well…That taste’s almost like chicken.
    Enough of silly bluffing.

    The atheists are only trying to run away from truth.
    Always nagging for the proof of the existence of God while they did little in the explanation of the existence of everything.

  15. archaeopteryx Says:

    Further comment would be superfluous.

  16. PEB Says:

    “If only non-believers had influence commensurate with our numbers.” would be more accurate as there are millions more non-believers than atheists.

    Sol is 99.9% atheist. He denies the existence of several hundred gods and believes in the one which neatly fits his narrow view of the world. This is convenient for him because it gives him an excuse to hate and to like Julio Iglesias.

  17. r j Says:

    why would a loving and all-powerful god inflict a low talent
    cruise-ship hack like julio inglesias upon the world ??

    also, has anyone else noticed that one of our contributors

    continually cites FOOD, CHAIRS, and lately GRAVITY as

    proof-positive evidence for the existence of a diety ?

    and NOW he’s pointing out that a towering talent like

    julio inglesias could ONLY be a gift of the all-knowing

    and benevolent god !!!!!!!!!!

    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  18. electrabotanical Says:

    America’s freedom of religion is under attack by those theists who want to inject their dogma into every facet of government and culture. It’s the atheists who work hardest to hold them back.

    You’re welcome.
    Can we get a little help here?

  19. Atheist MC Says:

    electra, I’ll drop a polite little memo to Michelle Bachmann requesting she try not to be so f&^%$g batshit crazy in future.

  20. Dan Says:

    Arrogant stone hearted lots that not even for once be thankful or appreciate what God have granted them.

    No, not arrogant or stone-hearted. We just use our heads a bit more and don’t have imaginary friends.

  21. Dan Says:

    Sorry Solly, I was traveling for the past two days. But as in my last comment, I see that you haven’t given up being a clueless and self-righteous half-wit.

  22. electrabotanical Says:

    Be sure to copy Rick Perry.

  23. electrabotanical Says:

    Any word on whether Dan Savage is going to google bomb Rick Santorum again? If you don’t know, be sure to google Santorum when you’re not at work.

    He threatened to redefine “Rick” and all I heard was a lot of bleep-in-the-bleep…Sounds great if it also hits Mr. Perry, another “Rick”.

    If none of this makes sense, watch the video http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/602a41c3d7/dan-savage-s-new-threat-to-rick-santorum

  24. R J Says:


    i agree with your post logged in at 17:03.

    do you find yourself looking around (( sort of sideways ))

    at the developing political images for the coming presidential

    hoo-hah ????? some of these people give me the